| Webster's Online Dictionary |
| Part of Speech | Definition | |
| Noun | 1. The art or practices of haruspices.[Websters]. | |
| Top | ||
|
Date "Haruspicy" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 1651. (references) |
| Domain | Definition | ||
| Noah Webster | [Noun] Divination by the inspection of victims.. Source: Webster's 1828 American Dictionary. | ||
| Wiktionary | [Noun] the study and divination by use of animal entrails, usually the victims of sacrifice. 1807, Charles Buck, A Theological Dictionary, Volume 1, Whitehall, page 238, Different kinds of divination, which have passed for sciences, we have had: � Haruspicy, by inspecting the bowels of animals. � 1825, Horace Smith, Gaieties and Gravities: A Series of Essays, Comic Tales, and Fugitive Vagaries, Volume II, H. Colburn, page 333, That our fates should be made dependent upon the stars, planets, and constellations, however preposterous a conceit, at least imparts a dignity to our nature by conjoining Heaven with earth: but that the doom of kings, empires, and individuals, should be regulated � by the entrails of victims, as analysed by the butchers of Haruspicy � is an evidence of stupid credulity that levels civilised man to the savage �. (references) | ||
|
Source: compiled by the editor from various references; see credits. | Top | ||
| Part of Speech | Definition | |
| Noun | 1. The art or practices of haruspices.[Websters]. | |
| Top | ||
Date "HARUSPICY" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 1651. (references) |
| Domain | Definition | ||
| Noah Webster | [Noun] Divination by the inspection of victims.. Source: Webster's 1828 American Dictionary. | ||
| Wiktionary | [Noun] the study and divination by use of animal entrails, usually the victims of sacrifice. 1807, Charles Buck, A Theological Dictionary, Volume 1, Whitehall, page 238, Different kinds of divination, which have passed for sciences, we have had: … Haruspicy, by inspecting the bowels of animals. … 1825, Horace Smith, Gaieties and Gravities: A Series of Essays, Comic Tales, and Fugitive Vagaries, Volume II, H. Colburn, page 333, That our fates should be made dependent upon the stars, planets, and constellations, however preposterous a conceit, at least imparts a dignity to our nature by conjoining Heaven with earth: but that the doom of kings, empires, and individuals, should be regulated … by the entrails of victims, as analysed by the butchers of Haruspicy … is an evidence of stupid credulity that levels civilised man to the savage …. (references) | ||
Source: compiled by the editor from various references; see credits. | Top | ||